Common Ground Left and Right

Common Ground Left and Right

James Quillian — Economist, Political Analyst, Natural Law

This applies to all of us in the great unwashed — not the country’s leadership class. Among ordinary Americans, left and right share more than either side wants to admit. Start with ignorance. Reading is fading fast.

86% of Americans now get their news digitally. Only 7% rely on print.
Over half get their “news” from Facebook, YouTube, or similar platforms — meaning headlines, captions, and a few sentences stand in for actual information. The share of adults who read for pleasure every day has collapsed by roughly 40% over two decades. In 2004, about 28% read daily. Today it’s 16%.

Most people now operate on fragments — headlines, click‑bait, and the first paragraph of an article. Capturing a citizen’s attention works the same way a matador works a bull: wave the red flag, get the charge, then deliver the sword.

Americans get the digital red flag. They follow it straight into someone else’s agenda. And the real danger isn’t the misinformation they’re supposedly being protected from — it’s the citizens who adopt the agenda and enforce it on everyone around them.

Meanwhile, Congress hoards information. Constituents are kept in the dark so they can’t interfere with personal political ambitions. Almost no one knows what’s actually happening in the world. They only know what the powerful want them to know. Opinions are shaped from the top down. Personal interaction is minimized. Public forums barely exist. People cling to pundits who are easy to manage because they fear losing their platform.

More misinformation flows from those in control than from the public they claim to be protecting.

Neither side — left or right — can accomplish anything without freedom of speech. And for the first time in a long while, concern about that freedom is starting to surface. Even in popular culture. Bruce Springsteen, for example, has begun touching the subject.

Americans have been insulated from stress for years. Now stress is unavoidable. And when stress rises, deeper thinking follows. It’s possible the masses may rediscover the First Amendment out of necessity. Both sides are being stifled. Both sides are feeling it.

So here’s the question:
Can the left and right recognize the common threat, hold their fire on each other for a moment, and reclaim a public voice — before returning to their usual disagreements?

It’s the only path that gives either side a future.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized by jamesq. Bookmark the permalink.

About jamesq

I write about economics, politics, and human behavior without the filters people use to protect their illusions. My work starts with natural law and ends with the world as it actually functions, not as citizens are encouraged to imagine it. Free markets evolved as an alternative to violence, and every modern trend away from them leads back toward coercion. I track those cycles, expose the incentives behind them, and explain how power really operates when the slogans are stripped away. Fantasy Free Economics exists to give readers an advantage: clarity in a world that rewards confusion. I don’t soften language, I don’t flatter tribes, and I don’t pretend that government, markets, or human nature are kinder than they are. My goal is simple—help people see the moving picture of events instead of the still frames they’re handed.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted