The Hypocrisy of the U.S. Attacking Iran

The Hypocrisy of the U.S. Attacking Iran
By James Quillian, Economist, Political Analyst, Teacher of Natural Law

Back in the 1950s, the United States toppled the only democratic system Iran ever managed to build for itself. That’s not conspiracy, that’s history. We remember 9/11 and will for generations. Why on earth wouldn’t the Iranians remember what was done to them in the 1950s? Memory doesn’t stop at the water’s edge.

And here at home, in a country where a president can assume sweeping, near‑dictatorial powers and walk away without so much as a political bruise, we still insist on calling ourselves a republic. That’s the label. But Natural Law teaches us to judge by function, not by definition. If it quacks like a dictatorship and governs like a dictatorship, the label on the stationery doesn’t change the smell in the room.

Continue reading

Calling It What It Is

Calling It What It Is

James Quillian, Economist, Political Analyst, Natural Law

Every so often, a country drifts so far from its own description that the polite thing to do is stop repeating the label. America still calls itself a republic, but that word has become more of a sentimental keepsake than an operating description. We keep it around the way families keep an old photograph on the mantle — not because it reflects the present, but because it reminds us of what we once were.

A republic is supposed to be a system where the people are in charge and the government works for them. That’s the definition. But definitions don’t govern anything. Function does. And if you look at how power actually behaves in Washington, you’ll notice something uncomfortable: the people who are supposed to be in charge aren’t, and the people who are supposed to be working for them aren’t doing much of that either.

Continue reading